I'd hope we can demonstrate finding consensus rather than using the vote to resolve this.
I still think forced retirement doesn't seem the right thing in this case so my -1 stands. In the other thread Alan now seems open to giving them another try, i've offered to help with that (any other offers of help?), what have we got to lose with trying that? ...ant On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote: > Another favor: > > What are the voting rules for this case? I'm assuming that -1 != veto, > but can anyone point to precedent or documentation I'd be grateful. > > A caution: I have been up since 4:15AM and it's now 7:24PM, so I'm > prone to overlook the obvious. > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > > Le 26 nov. 2012 21:06, "Benson Margulies" <bimargul...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> > >> For those voting -1, I'd like to see, on another thread, some > >> discussion about just how we handle podlings where there are > >> longstanding issues but no consensus on the PPMC.... > > > > Based on the mentors additional info, and after reviewing the project > > activity, I am changing my -1 to +1. > > > > Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
