I've confirmed this discrepancy is the same as what Alexander Broekhuis posted about, as noted in INFRA-5445.
So 0.2 is all good to go!! On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the > .md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I did not examine the signature > (.asc) to see if it matches the .tar.gz) > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 to release (IPMC, binding) >> >> [ apologies for the extreme delay :-( ] >> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joachim Dreimann >> <joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of >>> Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the >>> Bloodhound PPMC. >>> >>> The result of the vote is summarised here: >>> http://markmail.org/thread/zrgkleendiqvanzs >>> >>> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and KEYS >>> can be found here: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/ >>> >>> The release itself is created from: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.2 >>> (r1394550) >>> >>> Issues identified to be fixed for the next release are listed here: >>> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/246 >>> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/245 >>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.2 >>> [ ] +0 Don't care >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Joe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
