Hi,

>
> I agree that the download problem is not a blocker for the release.
> Until it is fixed, I suggest adding a note to any vote e-mails to warn
> reviewers about the problen.
>

Agreed.


>
> Using wget, I was able to download the archive, sig and hashes.
> The sig is OK.
> The hashes have an unusual format, which some tools may not be able to
> understand, but they do agree once this is allowed for.
>

Whats unusual about their format? I used [1] to generate the hashes. But if
for a next release this should be done different I'll know what to do.


> The NOTICE file says
>
> Copyright [2012] The Apache Software Foundation
>
> The [ and ] are not part of the standard format and should be removed.
>
> The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license.
>
> Otherwise the contents of the archive looks OK and seems to agree with SVN.
>

The graffle file is created by me but can be removed from the repository.
And the NOTICE file is a small change. Is it ok if this is done in SVN so
that we can accept this release? In other words, can we get a +1 on this?

Thanks!


[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Alexander Broekhuis

Reply via email to