On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > picking up Benson's initial question, just my 2c: how about encouraging a > key signing party (or something alike, but more informal and/or with fewer > people) through general@i.a.o for every Apachecon, say 2-3 weeks before it > starts? If there's something ongoing is easier to hop in than lurking for > unaware committers in search of a key signing. At least, it should put in > touch interested people.
At the first and only Apachecon I attended, there was such a party. But I somehow completely missed the memo in advance, and so could not participate. Oh Secretary, why not create a 'role' PGP key and use it? > > > br, > juan pablo > > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name>wrote: > >> Craig L Russell wrote on Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 08:59:26 -0700: >> > Hi Florian, >> > >> > On Oct 5, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Florian Holeczek wrote: >> > >> >> if I understood the Apache pseudonym rules right, the only one who >> >> would be able to sign such a key was secretary@, since it's the only >> >> one who knows the pseudonym's real identity. >> > >> >> Not possible. There is no PGP key for secret...@apache.org (as a "role >> identity"). >> >> > The ICLA documents are available to all Apache Foundation Members. They >> > are confidential but hundreds of people can view them. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
