Hi, On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > Volunteers for what? To use Steve you'll need
To start with a volunteer to list the requirements you just listed. Thanks! :-) From your points it looks like we'd also need a few vote counters/monitors and the rest is something I should be able to coordinate with root@. On 2 October 2012 00:00, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems a bit premature. Let's see if we have more than one candidate. > So far we have none. I'm pretty confident that we'll get some good candidates. I have some in mind, but wanted to leave the discussion open for now before starting to nominate people. If only one candidate appears or a consensus arises among multiple nominees (like it did earlier this year), there's of course no need for a more complicated voting process. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:49 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also is there any reason to vote in secret? > AFAIK all other PMC chair votes are just held on the private list. > > Using Steve (as currently implemented) involves quite a bit of overhead. My main motivation for bringing Steve up is that a part of the motivation to turn that code into a TLP was to make it easier for people both inside and outside of Apache to use. The IPMC chair election would be a nice opportunity to showcase the system in action. If it indeed is too much overhead, then let's scrap the idea and fall back to a normal vote on private@. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
