This is something I recall from clarifications by Roy some while back - made a lot of sense to me. I'm not aware of it being documented anywhere, nor am I aware of it having been collectively agreed. If we can work out where, I'd be happy to write it up.
Upayavira On Mon, Oct 1, 2012, at 01:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Upayavira wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 13:26:00 +0100: > > Note, podlings are free to check in IP that is dubious from a *policy* > > perspective (i.e. incompatible with Apache License), but should not, as > > I see it, check in anything that is dubious from a *legal* one (i.e. it > > is not and should not be public, or we don't have *any* rights to > > distribute). While we may not consider putting stuff into SVN as > > publishing or distributing, others might not agree with that. > > > > Is this info on www.a.o/legal/ somewhere? If not, should it? > > > I've not heard of anyone demanding us to remove something from SVN > > entirely, and I believe that would be a very painful exercise. Best is > > to make sure it is only license compatibility issues that exist before > > code is checked in. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
