Joe: that is what is being discussed. Blessed binaries. Go back to Dennis' email for the need for these.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > WHAT PROBLEM? THERE IS NO PROBLEM HERE, > CURRENT POLICY FULLY COVERS WHAT AOO ACTUALLY > DOES. END OF DISCUSSION. > > > A discussion about blessing binaries with > cryptographic signatures supplied by the org > is totally out ofscope for this thread. > > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >>To: general@incubator.apache.org >>Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 3:08 PM >>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote >> >>This policy is enshrined in the original foundation articles of >>incorporation, and has been restated, over and over, by board members. >>Most colorfully by Roy T. Fielding, who was 'present at the birth.' >> >>Many are sympathetic to the AOO situation, and this is why the >>suggestion from the VP legal was to start a discussion about how to >>evolve to accomodate AOO rather than simply a flat refusal to consider >>the problem. >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
