The consensus in the group of committers listed in the proposal is
that we would like to discourage piling on of pre-formation committers
and encourage adding committers after formation based on
contributions.  It is clear that there are gobs of people with the
credentials and track record to be potential contributors, but it is
also clear that many of these people have huge demands on their time.
That leaves doubt about how much contribution they can or should be
making to a new project.

It is also clear that there are gobs of people that are not already
part of Apache who may have time and expertise to contribute.

In any case, the vote is already started and will be done before long.
 Let's go with what we are already voting on without changing it in
mid-stream and then adjust later.  Progress, not perfection, as they
say.

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> Wasn't clear, can I add myself now?
>>
>> Didn't the Incubator go back to discouraging open enrollment?...
>
> AFAIK, no. What was discussed is that incoming podlings should clearly
> state their requirements for people that want to be added as initial
> committers, to keep it fair.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to