[cc-ed to dev@ and changed the subject] Hello Jukka,
You wrote: > IP clearance -> No release: Openmeetings The release vote have successfully passed and forwarded to general@ list [1]. What should be our next step? Have we got Incubator PMC approval? Can we proceed with wider distribution? [1] http://markmail.org/message/azenwwlcfhnxmysf -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> My suggestion is to ask the podlings now in category 2 to report again >> in May on their progress on the identified blockers. If there's been >> no measurable progress by then, we'll dig deeper to see what we can >> do. Podlings reporting in other months can be picked up for a similar >> oversight cycle over the coming months. By July we should then have a >> pretty accurate record of progress throughout the entire Incubator, >> including a clear list of podlings that are stuck and need help. > > Following up on this, here's a quick graph I put together when > preparing for this month's board report: http://twitpic.com/a7o368 > > The graph shows how podlings have moved from one (subjective) > categorization to another (or to graduation/retirement) between their > two scheduled reports in the February-July time frame (I'm only > counting projects that were already past their first three months at > the Incubator). The edge width is proportional to the number of > podlings that made that particular "state change". The Graphviz source > of the graph is included at the end of this message. > > The overall picture looks pretty good. We have strong movement towards > graduation, and so far no regressions from the "ready to graduate" > state back to low activity or diversity. > > Here's the list of projects that stayed at the same category from one > report to the next: > > IP clearance: Amber > No release: Any23, Bloodhound, Cordova, JSPWiki > Low activity: Ambari, AWF, EasyAnt, Kitty, Nuvem, PhotArk, Kato > Low diversity: Airavata, Bigtop, Chukwa, Tashi > Ready to graduate: Flume, Lucene.NET, NPanday > > The IP clearance issue in Amber seems to be finally resolved ( LEGAL-134). > > The release issues are being resolved, as Any23 has just passed a > release vote and I've seen good progress towards an Apache release in > both Cordova and JSPWiki. I don't know the release status in > Bloodhound. > > The low activity projects remain a problem though there are a few > projects who've managed to escape that trap. For the rest we need to > find solutions. Kato was already retired, and AWF and Kitty getting > there. EasyAnt might go the subproject route, and PhotArk has been > showing increased activity lately. I don't know what's going on in > Ambari or Nuvem. > > The low diversity "state" is a bit vague catchall category for > projects that don't yet feel ready to graduate. I'm not too concerned > if some projects take a bit longer there as long as they don't regress > to low activity. Once a project has hit the "low diversity" category, > chances are quite high that it'll end up graduating. > > The podlings that were "ready to graduate" for more than three months > are a bit mixed story. Flume already graduated and Lucene.NET is just > about to, but NPanday looks to be in trouble as activity there seems > to have plummeted since May for some reason. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > ---- > > /* > IP clearance -> IP clearance: Amber > IP clearance -> No release: Openmeetings > No release -> No release: Any23, Bloodhound, Cordova, JSPWiki > No release -> Low diversity: Mesos > No release -> Ready to graduate: Clerezza, DirectMemory, > OpenOffice, Stanbol > Low activity -> Low activity: Ambari, AWF, EasyAnt, Kitty, > Nuvem, PhotArk, Kato > Low activity -> Retire: Kalumet, Zeta Components > Low activity -> No release: Celix, VXQuery > Low activity -> Low diversity: SIS > Low activity -> Ready to graduate: Wink > Low diversity -> Low activity: Droids, ODF Toolkit > Low diversity -> Low diversity: Airavata, Bigtop, Chukwa, Tashi > Low diversity -> No release: S4, Wave > Low diversity -> Ready to graduate: Etch, HCatalog, Isis, Kafka, > Oozie, VCL, Wookie > Low diversity -> Graduate: Hama, MRUnit > Ready to graduate -> Ready to graduate: Flume, Lucene.NET, NPanday > Ready to graduate -> Graduate: Accumulo, Jena, ManifoldCF, > OpenNLP, RAT, Rave, Sqoop > */ > > digraph Incubator { > /* { rank = same; "IP clearance"; "no release"; "low activity"; "low > diversity" } */ > { rank = same; "graduated"; "retired" } > "IP clearance" -> "IP clearance" [penwidth=1]; > "IP clearance" -> "no release" [penwidth=1]; > "no release" -> "no release" [penwidth=4]; > "no release" -> "low diversity" [penwidth=1]; > "no release" -> "ready to graduate" [penwidth=4]; > "low activity" -> "low activity" [penwidth=7]; > "low activity" -> "retired" [penwidth=3]; > "low activity" -> "no release" [penwidth=2]; > "low activity" -> "low diversity" [penwidth=1]; > "low activity" -> "ready to graduate" [penwidth=1]; > "low diversity" -> "low diversity" [penwidth=4]; > "low diversity" -> "low activity" [penwidth=2]; > "low diversity" -> "no release" [penwidth=2]; > "low diversity" -> "ready to graduate" [penwidth=7]; > "low diversity" -> "graduated" [penwidth=2]; > "ready to graduate" -> "ready to graduate" [penwidth=3]; > "ready to graduate" -> "graduated" [penwidth=7]; > } > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
