@Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates? About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
"The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution statements those licenses may require." => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License I would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution. All 3th party licenses are in the License file. I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file. Sebastian 2012/6/26 sebb <seb...@gmail.com> > On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted > > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far) > > > > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list. > > Results: > > PPMC: > > aaf +1 (mentor) > > solomax +1 > > eschwert +1 > > alvaro +1 > > > > Wider Community: 3 times +3 > > > > Result Vote Thread: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > The Vote Thread: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README > > > > Full Changelog: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG > > > > Release artefacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/ > > The ASF releases source. > Why is there no Zip archive of the source? > There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds. > > The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of > them duplicated). > It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included > in the LICENSE file. > I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file. > > The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate > only to the content which is actually included. > This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives > (unless the binary is created only from the source). > > The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices. > > > Tag: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/ > > The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence > for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file. > The NOTICE file is for required notices only. > > As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the > source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only > refer to them. > > > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395): > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Best regards. > > > > -- > > Sebastian Wagner > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > http://www.openmeetings.de > > http://www.webbase-design.de > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.openmeetings.de http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
