Hi, Am 26. März 2012 17:20 schrieb Roy T. Fielding <field...@gbiv.com>: > On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe <shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The LICENSE file includes references to lots of jars that are dual >>> licensed under CDDL v1.0 and GPL v2. >>> However, there is no indication which license has been chosen by the >>> project. >>> >>> I think this is a blocker. > > A project does not choose a license. The license is provided by the copyright > owner. We do not change that license, nor do we reduce the number of the > available licenses to choose from, for downstream recipients. Therefore, > it doesn't make any sense to indicate which one is "chosen". >
I am following all these discussions for doing a first release of Apache Stanbol (incubating) but get totally confused. According to http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#mutually-exclusive you have to choose the license and include only the license that you have chosen. -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
