On 26 March 2012 17:51, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> For projects who have settled on a permanent >> name, some things might be better. But this >> does not make life easier for the project nor >> infra when our incubator-related infra depends >> on naming conventions being followed, so this >> decisions isn't purely an IPMC one. > > Good point. > > Perhaps limit this option only to podlings that have already gone > through the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process as a part of preparing the > initial proposal? That would be a great added incentive for projects > to pay good attention to naming right at the beginning.
Having a different process for podlings in different stages seems like needless complication. This might mean that projects hold off creating sites for longer. At present, podling sites can be created under incubator without needing to involve infra at all. So less work for infra for the podlings that don't graduate - or don't graduate to a TLP. I don't know whether this will still be possible under svnpubsub/CMS > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
