On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > <nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On the other hand, I totally respect that Cloudera's interest to support > > their customers and provide backword compatibility, but this is *not* the > > point at all, the point is this *should* not, and even allow me to say > this > > is *must* not be the problem of Apache, and yes I agree with the opinion > > that this is a matter to be decided by Sqoop team but not to make > Apache's > > problem. So also let not get more into this!!! > > Or course this is Apache's problem. You can't have your cake and eat > it too. If you accept code for a project you accept the community as > well. Say Apache accepts a project like Open Office, should we ignore > the existing community and not concern ourselves with backward > compatibility for that project as well, because the original code > wasn't birthed at Apache? > That's a very slippery slope. Maybe some projects get way too much leeway because of the big flashing lights. Regardless of how big the press headlines are all projects should be held to the same standard. No project should be allowed to graduate without solving all issues pertaining to marks. It's a failure of the incubator in the past for allowing other projects to do so. I'm shocked it was allowed. -- Best Regards, -- Alex
