With that explanation, I vote: +1 On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >> On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>>> From my perspective, Chris's proposal and Benson's vote above >>> effectively turned this into a single issue question: is now the time >>> for Noah to be replaced by Jukka? >>> >>> There are no question that all four individuals in question are great >>> guys. However despite the protestations to the contrary, all >>> available evidence at the present time show that Jukka has more time >>> available to devote to the Incubator. This means that we have here a >>> (possibly only modestly incremental) improvement, and one that is >>> readily reversible if necessary. What's not to like? >>> >> >> I'd still like a definitive list of who is running and a "real" >> vote that includes all candidates. Is the presumption that Jukka >> is the only candidate valid?? > > Chris and I have bowed out in favor of Jukka. No one else was > nominated except Noel, and Noel made it clear that he was ready to > make way for a new chair if the community chose one. Bertrand and/or > Sam asked us to try to reach a consensus on one candidate. > > So, this vote tests a consensus to install Jukka in place of Noel. If > no one objects, I personally think that the question is entirely > answered. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
