On 02/09/2012 07:42 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > 2. I wrote an Incubator deconstruction proposal here: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorDeconstructionProposal > > I still wholly believe in the proposal and that it should be implemented. > It contains a series of (potentially revertible) steps that in my mind will > remove unnecessary overheads and get us to the philosophy of > "Incubation yes; Incubator, no". The Incubator was a success, it's > served its purpose. We should celebrate and move on.
An alternative to pro-actively deconstructing the Incubator might be to try the direct-to-TLP approach on some new projects. If this new approach demonstrates a smoother path to TLP than traditional incubation then new projects would prefer it and the Incubator would wither and die a natural death. We don't need a vote by the IPMC to try this. Just find a candidate project and bring a proposal to the board. Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
