On 2011-11-25, ant elder wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> > wrote:
>> The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is >> not a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not? (@Leo, help!) > Not including something in the NOTICE that must be required might be a > blocking problem but including just a little more than is necessary > isn't IMHO. If it was a podling release with so much unnecessary stuff > that it showed they didn't really understand the requirements maybe > thats worth voting against so they go and sort it out but for > something like this i think its ok to say sort it out later Agreed. I'll make sure it gets sorted out before the next release https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-458 Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
