I wanted to pick back up on the reporting issue raised, separately to the concept of an informal chair.
I'm +1 to to what Sam and Joe said. Is this something the incubator could start working towards for the December report? I would still like to see the podling reports either included in the report or linked to the incubator web site - but having the summary information and actions with assurance they'd already been reviewed would be very helpful. Cheers, Brett On 22/11/2011, at 1:05 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> To me a lot of the problem stems from the fact that the reports are >> misdirected- instead of informing the board about the activities of >> the IPMC, it tells them about the podling's activities, which doesn't >> scale properly. >> >> We should be reporting to the board about OUR work, not the work of >> the podlings. Podlings should only be brought in for a few specific >> examplesto mention. That's the first thing to correct. > > +1 > > - Sam Ruby > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
