Coming back to this..... It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation that Olio will graduate.
So, voting: [ ] +1 [ ] -1, no because... Hen On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. >> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >>> On 8/17/2011 12:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >>>> The copyright item isn't signed off at >>>> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/olio.html. >>>> >>>> So would need to delete the code (assuming a successful retirement vote). >>> >>> Where are the mentors? >>> >>> Wondering how conflicted-providence IP would hit svn in the first place. >> >> Digging a bit: >> >> "Initial Olio code dump from Sun" by clr. r700550 >> "Added rails webapp" by wsobel. r705828 >> "Adding Web20Emulator" by sheetal. r706388 >> >> There were other large adds, but those were the three initial big ones. >> >> I don't see any software grants relating to Olio. I see lots in the >> board reports about struggling to get committer diversity because the >> committers were at 3 corporations. >> >> I don't believe that conflicted-providence IP would have hit svn, yet >> if it's not signed off and (assuming no one steps up to say otherwise) >> I think delete is the only option we have. > > Agreed. Unless the mentors can check off that checkbox prior to the > project's dormancy, svn will need to be rm'ed. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
