On Sep 4, 2011 3:41 AM, "Bernd Fondermann" <bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >... > > So, you are saying more than 10% of the non-generated code base (and you are > not counting lib-style uses/JARs here, right?) is derived from other Apache > code? That seems to be unusual. Just curious, could you elaborate a bit > about why you did that amd what kind of code that is? Thank you.
You make it sound like deriving from our code base is a bad thing, and should be justified. I don't get it. That is what we *want* people to do. What is your concern here? Cheers, -g
