Yes, should be figured out while podling. It is really just convenient if the same stuff (like Spring and CDI integration) can get re-used without having to introduce a new mechanism.
But of course, there are eventually also cons with this approach ... LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 7/4/11, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Date: Monday, July 4, 2011, 4:45 PM > On 7/4/11 6:38 PM, Roger Schildmeijer > wrote: > > On 4 jul 2011, at 18.31em, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > >> I have not looked at Deft a lot, but only from a > 10.000 feet point ;) > >> > >> It is just that such things like Filters, etc > which are available for Mina already used to be very helpful > for lots of projects. > >> Do such things exist in Deft too? > > There is no such corresponding feature in Deft, at > least not at the moment :) > > In any case, I don't think that Deft *has* to use MINA, or > not. It's probably something that could be discussed once > the podling is accepted, and by the core developpers. > > Now, what is more important is to check how close are > AsyncWeb and Deft, to see if those two project should be > merged, or not, and if Deft has enough potential to be a > TLP, or not. > > I'm not even sure it should be put under MINA's umbrella. > I'd say it would be convenient, but has side effects. This > should be discussed. > > -- Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
