On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 20:47, Raphael Bircher <r.birc...@gmx.ch> wrote: > Hi all > > Because this is my first mail, I give a short introduction to myself. > > I'm Raphael Bircher from Switzerland. I contribute for OOo since 5 years as > QA and in same other tecnical parts. I was involved by the migration to the > kenai Infrastructur, and I'm willing to help by seting up the new > infrastructure, if this help is welcome from the ASF side.
Welcome! If you're interested in infrastructure, then Joe Schaefer recommended joining the infrastruct...@apache.org mailing list[1]. > Am 06.06.11 02:13, schrieb Niall Pemberton: >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Stein<gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >... >> There are 146 projects listed on OpenOffice.org - all with mailing >> lists. Last time I read the proposal, it wasn't clear how many of >> these are active and being brought across. It does suggest though that >> a single dev list is not sufficient. > > We have many many lists, a load of this lists are dead. Anyway, The 4 lists > are ok, if this is onli for the startup while the kenai infrastructure from > Oracle is running. If we realy switch to apache, we need much more ML, e.g > for native language projects, etc. That was my thought, too. Also note that we're talking about an initial committer list of around 40-50 people (it is approaching 40 now). That many people can easily work on a single list. And yeah... over time, more lists can be constructed as necessary. We're just talking about the initial set. And similar to you, I feel pretty strong about keeping it minimal. Separating across too many lists might lose the necessary "critical mass". Cheers, -g [1] send mail to infrastructure-subscr...@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
