Op 5-6-2011 19:19, Christian Lippka schreef:
Hi Ralph,
Am 05.06.2011 18:46, schrieb Ralph Goers:
On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I posted a similar statement yesterday. Personally, I think the
traffic
on this list has settled down a lot in the last 24 hours and is now
focusing in on topics more relevant to this list. But maybe that
is just
because it was Saturday :-)
Most of the sniping^H^H^H^Hdiscussion has moved over to the libreoffice
lists at this point.
What I am still waiting to hear on are:
1. The amount of code in the project that the grant didn't give to us
under the Apache License.
Not a blocker for starting incubation. IOW we don't ask for this
level of
detail from other podlings.
It might be a blocker for my vote. You are, of course, free to vote
differently. This is a much larger project than usually enters the
incubator. I'm worried that if the project has too much of this kind
of work to deal with it will kill the community.
If I understand you correctly, your question is if the supplied set of
source files is missing something to
make this a working project.
As stated earlier, the list of source files provided look like a 1:1
copy from the mercurial
repository available at OpenOffice.org.
I was looking at that, but I have the impression that the source code
for a number of "external" projects is not present in the mercurial
checkout and still has to be retrieved as part of the building process.
There are makefiles, patches etc., but no source code worth mentioning,
in subdirectories stlport, openssl, hunspell, libxslt...
It might be all of these: http://hg.services.openoffice.org/binaries/
--
Vriendelijke groet,
Simon Brouwer.
| http://nl.openoffice.org | http://www.opentaal.org |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
