On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > > On 4 Jun 2011, at 12:19, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> >>> >> LibreOffice complements anything we do here at Apache to those who >> agree with the license terms under which LibreOffice is made >> available. Until or unless we resolve that issue, I feel that the >> statement above would need to be both qualified in this manner and >> extended to enumerate other complements that might apply in other >> situations. > > I disagree. LO has a focus on the binary deliverables and the consumer > destinations they reach that is perfectly complementary to the developer > focus of Apache. This complementarity is entirely unrelated to licensing.
Just to be clear: you disagree with enumerating other complements that might apply in other situations? > S. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
