On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 14:27, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> What might be reasonably hoped for is that the ASF could act as an >> upstream for GPLv3 office product(s) with a reunited community >> spanning these projects (as widely as ideologically possible). I would >> definitely like to see the proposal explain whether this would be >> possible and practical. > > There is nothing to explain. The licenses are (one way) compatible: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2 > > To explain what I mean by one-way, here's a picture: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3-compatibility.png
I much prefer Fitz and Dan's licensing diagram: http://www.cl.ly/5nAo :-P :-P --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
