Oh completely agreed there. A lot of this hot-air is quite premature. Geronimo was nothing other than a JBoss fork and we had no problems entertaining that resolution, I see no major concerns for OOo other than volunteer resources signed up for the task.
----- Original Message ---- > From: Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Fri, June 3, 2011 2:12:03 PM > Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal: Splitting the Community? > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Cmon Jim, he wrote a lengthy monologue which spelled > > out his position. As I read it, we could license > > the OpenOffice trademark to the Document Foundation > > for, as Simon put it, "business as usual" distributions. > > If we wanted to we could specify a time/date/event > > upon which that license terminates, and the "new" > > stuff going on at the ASF would be distributing code > > under the mark. > > Just remember, we haven't yet even voted on whether or not to accept > the podling. > > These are decisions the podling should be making. > > - Sam Ruby > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
