Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote on 06/02/2011 11:06:54 AM: > > On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:40 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: > > > > > I'd like to think that no one is working on LibreOffice merely because
> > they have no choice, or that giving everyone a choice is seen as being > > antagonistic. If truly 100% of the LibreOffice members prefer TDF to > > Apache, then you have nothing to worry about, right? If some prefer > > Apache, then you have worries, if you choose to worry about such things, > > but I don't take it as a moral fault in Apache or in the authors of this > > proposal that we are offering an open source development choice that some > > developers might prefer over TDF. > > > > I don't see this as 2 "competing" projects... well, maybe right > now it is, but what it is "now" doesn't mean that is how it > should be, or will turn out to be. > > One simple example: Imagine the Apache project as the core > "guts" of OOo, the framework. With TDF working on parts > that extend and enhance OOo, in a modular fashion, for > a particular set of end-users... or something like that. +1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
