+1 (with the one required mentor/IPMC vote and notifying private@) david jencks
On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Glen Daniels wrote: > +1 from me. > > I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be OK > with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensure that someone is paying > attention... but it would be nice if we didn't need two. > > --Glen > > On 11/12/2010 3:20 AM, ant elder wrote: >> I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make >> someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are >> votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need >> for votes from Incubator PMC members or a separate Incubator PMC vote. >> >> As justification, this is the process that was in place some years ago >> and it worked fine like that, there is the "experiment" currently in >> place with some poddlings doing this which seems to be working ok, and >> the board has said they're ok with it. >> >> ...ant >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
