Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> The SCA bindings do sound interesting, but one of the first goals is,
> is to have a means to communicate with Java OSGi, and to have a light
weight
> implementation.
I strongly suggest, then, that you work with the Tuscany folks and leverage
their existing implementations, and not reinvent that particular wheel; you
have enough other work to do. :-) SCA bindings are lightweight, flexible,
and protocol agnostic.
> Since the first user has a environment in which Java and C is used
For your Java and C usage, you could even have in-process SCA bindings, not
just remote.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
