On Monday 23 August 2010 8:24:48 pm Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Luciano, > > > > A River committer has indicated a lack of interest in remaining > > involved. Emeritus status seems overkill in a podling, but that's just > > my opinion. Since this is an active expression of dis-interest, the > > 'how long' question seems not too relevant to me. > > > > As part of cleaning them up for graduation, based on my experience > > back on CXF, I'm thinking that it would be good to trim the committer > > list by at least removing people who actively aren't interested. > > I think that the committer list could very well remain without > trimming as it will be a decent record of past contributors,
IMO, if someone no longer wants to be on it, remove them. "svn log" is a decent record of past contributors so that is irrelevant. Dan > and that > the effort is put into "Who is going to be on the PMC if/when a > podling graduate?" which is effectively the "current stewards of the > codebase". > > > Cheers -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
