On Aug 11, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:07:33 PM >> Subject: Re: an experiment >> >> +1 to IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making >> process for voting in new committers (one question, >> would they need an ACK from IPMC - similar to how PMC's >> send a note to the board for an ACK for new pmc members)? > > That certainly sounds like a reasonable thing to do, sure. >
+1 >> In the 2nd question, "significant committers", are we asking >> mentors to identify such candidates for addition to IPMC, >> especially release managers for example? if so, +1 for that >> as well. > I was also curious as to the mechanism for determining "significance"--I would be satisfied with mentors' recommendation as outlined by dims. I wonder if there should be some limit/function to determine the number of non-Member representatives a given podling may have on the IPMC. -Matt > Absolutely, especially RM's that have gotten into the habit > of running RAT themselves. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
