On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Plan: raise an issue, and we fix it. >> >> Not sure what else you're looking for. > > I was just pointing out that if you want to do the release review > based on an existing 1.6.x release, I wouldn't expect it to be fully > compliant with Apache policies (license headers, etc.) and would > accept a plan on how those issues will be (or already are being) > resolved in the first Apache release of Subversion (1.7.0?). To me > that would satisfy the release-related exit criteria we have.
FWIW, the Subversion nightly server is back online: http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/nightly/ The cron job used to generate those tarballs uses the exact same rolling scripts we use to generate standard releases, so those tarballs could be used to test whatever non-process-related qualifications for release people want to see. -Hyrum --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
