2009/10/29 Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>: > 1. Anyone can distribute GPL-licensed binary, or LGPL-licensed > library. The virus problems begin when you try to modify the source of > the product. This always requires proper attributions in COPYRIGHT > file, but anyway.
Correct (to a point), see separate mail. > 2. Apache may have more strict guidelines on distributions. Nothing > prevents us to write a small Apache-licensed Red5 installer and > distribute it instead. Not really necessary. Users can do the download themselves. > 3. The truth is that currently Openmeetings is not built on pure > Apache stack. I cannot see a problem here. Most Apache products used > Sun's java when there was no Harmony, and Sun's vm was not even FOSS. IMHO, and IANAL either, this is a case where; 1. I think it is Ok if the project lists "Red5" or "Adobe FMS" as "System Requirements" as it is clearly very tied to this kind of technology. 2. That this or new/separate project later develops such a server at Apache. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
