Hello Niclas, Thanks for a link [1]! It reads: > The LGPL is ineligible primarily due to the restrictions it places on larger > works
Well, I believe if lawyers said that, they have enough attribution. Though I always thought that LGPL is GPL limited to the library scope. How does LGPL place restrictions on larger works? [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Sebastian Wagner <seba.wag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Is a LGPL Library a general Issue? For running the application we also use >> hibernate. >> Spring, Apache Batik and Apache Mina are also used, but these are all >> already Apache Licenses projects. Hibernate is LGPL. Is this a conflict? > > For "hard dependencies" then LGPL is an issue. If you ship optional > features which relies on LGPL components, then that is generally Ok. > > Some questions on this are already answered; > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html , but if in doubt contact > legal-disc...@apache.org for clarifications prior to shipping > non-Apache licensed material. > > > Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://www.telecom-express.ru/ http://harmony.apache.org/ http://www.expressaas.com/ http://openmeetings.googlecode.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
