On Sep 29, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:


This is why I complained about a podling release procedure.

We started a voting process to release M3 at September 1 and are still not able to release. This maybe related with not enough IPMC members in our community list to get their binding votes.

Gurkan,
I understand your desire to release M3. The review process has discovered several problems in the M3 release. So, that's a good thing. "Problems" are also part of the reason that the release has taken so long. Looking back, I see that some of the votes have taken a bit of time. I am also at least partly responsible, being a bit slow on voting in the initial podling vote.

I have a few suggestions that might be useful:

1. If a vote has been silent for a few days, post a gentle reminder to the community. I see you've been doing this, but don't wait 5 days. If after 2 or 3 days of a vote being open, I don't mind being reminded...

2. Follow gene...@incubator and legal-discuss@ mailing lists. Sometimes, release requirements change or perhaps more accurately, people's understanding of release requirements change... Proactively addressing changes can help avoid problems during a vote.

3. I notice that some podlings have been pre-reviewing releases on gene...@incubator. This could also help reduce review time.

--kevan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to