On Sep 28, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
2009/9/28 Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com>:
On Sep 28, 2009, at 7:12 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 28, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert
<david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote:
Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build
with a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly if
needed,
but this is another problem we can address later.
Personally, I'd much prefer to see some community setup, prior to
these types of discussions and code changes -- mailing lists,
committer account setup, etc. The fact that we're forced to
discuss this on general@ is, IMO, not very good.
Agreed. Plus a quick 30 minute email discussion does not
constitute community consensus. While this does not require that
everything move lock step through community discussions, do not get
upset if a discussion moves in a different direction after you have
made impromptu changes.
That's the whole purpose of RTC, isn't it ?
Yep. I think I pointed that out, albeit obliquely, above. But, since
you point this out I'll add a finer point to RTC. The gist of RTC is
that as people's work gets more narrowly focused, running every minute
detail by the community makes the work impossible. Hence RTC.
We are no where near there at this point. We're at the point where
newcomers can grok what's going on in the project. It's a perfect
time to collect opinions and to build community.
Regards,
Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
