On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes <hugh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>>> If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for "anything >>>> OSGI enterprisey" then my -1 vote will stand. >>> >>> Really it isn't. I mentioned earlier in this thread that Aries will >>> seek to use components from other projects where they exist. >> >> I rest my case. Your argument is that the text is sufficient, I mean >> it is not (too inclusive). >> Let's adjourn this for the graduation. I am urging that the community >> along the way think long and hard on the formulation of project >> mission. > > Thanks Niclas. I certainly will be expecting (and prodding) the community to > work at addressing your (and any other IPMC member's) concern. > > This vote has been open for a week, now. There's a lot of interest and > support for the project. Concerns about the scope of the project have been > raised. Addressing these concerns should be an important objective for the > community. I think it's time to call this vote. Jeremy, since you initiated > the VOTE, best for you to do the honors...
I'd be interested in what people thought they voted for. The list of participants seems to have been constantly changing throughout the vote, but we can only be voting on one proposal, so which one was it? Did people who voted early implicitly vote for people who were not on the list at the time they voted? That doesn't sound right to me. -- Martin Cooper > > --kevan > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
