On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Miller
<kevan.mil...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jochen,
In addition to the copyright date, when I build locally, some of
the jars
are not being generated with all of the required LICENSE, NOTICE,
DISCLAIMER
files. However, looks like your generated binaries are correct. On
my
system:
apache-rat/target/apache-rat-0.6.jar does not include a LICENSE
apache-rat-tasks/target/apache-rat-tasks-0.6.jar does not include
a LICENSE
or a NOTICE
Any idea why I'd see different behavior?
are you -Lrelease ...?
that should have been -Prelease (i think)
K. So, they are included for a -Prelease. Better to always include
them, IMO, but not necessary, I guess. So, I'm +1.
--kevan
