Hi Andrus, Of course, as I have named BuildProcess AutoDeploy (on sourceforge :)), we can name Apache AutoDeploy. When I have submitted my proposal to Incubator mailing list, I have thinking about changing the AutoDeploy name as I think that it's a very generic name and already used by some application servers (ever if the scope is not at all the same).
So Apache AutoDeploy is already in the race :) Thanks Andrus, Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net On Wed 24/12/08 13:27, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: > > On Dec 24, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > > > What have happened to previous tradition of coming > up with good > obscure names?? > > > > SpretFlinter (zero hits) > > Crentacto (one hit) > > Bristasse (116 hits) > > Not to make JB's job any harder, but IMO these examples are just > silly. BTW, what tradition are you referring to? > > > How hard can it be? > > It is hard. Random letter combinations do not sound that good. BTW, > what was wrong with AutoDeploy? > > Andrus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
