Am asking because, the way the situation is being portrayed is that anyone using maven is totally unable to use the incubator artifacts...that's wrong.
thanks, dims On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jukka, > > I see where you are going with this. But what i cannot for the life of > me understand is why adding a tiny snippet of xml to project B's pom > is so objectionable (adding another repo)? No one has yet answered > that question for me. > > thanks, > dims > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I know...hence my VOTE was what it was. >> >> So my questions go out to people who opposed the proposed policy change: >> >> 1) Is it OK for project A to bundle the incubating dependency? >> >> 2) If yes, why should things be more complex for project B? >> >> BR, >> >> Jukka Zitting >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
