Why not? :-) You could write an web application with COBOL for .NET ... or not. :-)
But still, the part about the Jawi language is just for curiosity. jwcarman wrote: > > "No longer any known fluent speakers" > > Perhaps we should have a COBOL implementation, then. :) > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> By the way, I forgot to mention that Jawi has everything to do with Java >> (the >> Island... @ Malaysia). >> >> Quoting Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jawi,_Penang): >> "Jawi is a town on the mainland side of Penang, Malaysia." >> >> And for those who can't go to Wikipedia to check what Jawi is, here is >> the >> rest: >> >> "Jawi is a nearly extinct Australian Aboriginal language of Western >> Australia, the traditional language of the Jawi people. There are no >> longer >> any known fluent speakers, but there may be some partial speakers." >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jawi_language >> >> cheers! >> >> >> Bruno Borges wrote: >>> >>> Olio sounds good, but there's nothing related with Java, Web, frameworks >>> or anything else... (or, is just me who couldn't find any information >>> about this word?) >>> >>> So, because of the lack of co-relation between Olio and Java Webkits, I >>> found that there's an word which could fit better: Jawi >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jawi >>> >>> Could also be an acronymous of Java Webkits Incubator =) >>> >>> cheers, >>> Bruno Borges >>> >>> >>> William Sobel-2 wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 22, 2008, at 10:14 AM, Janne Jalkanen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just in case nobody mentioned this to you yet: "Olio" is the Finnish >>>>> word for "object" as in "object relational database" or "object- >>>>> oriented programming". You may or may not find this suitable. :-) >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, it also means that there are quite a few Finnish IT >>>>> companies with the word "olio" in their name. Also, "olio.fi" is >>>>> owned by a Finnish web design company (though they haven't put >>>>> anything on it yet). Again, this may or may not be suitable. :-/ >>>> >>>> >>>> I vote for Olio. I doubt if we'll find any string of sounds that won't >>>> be in use someplace. Apache is widely used for many corporations and >>>> this doesn't seem to be an issue. I think the OO relationship is a >>>> positive. >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Will Sobel >>>> Visiting Lecturer >>>> RADLab - UC Berkeley >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Names-for-the-Web2.0kit-tp19519690p19633425.html >> Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Names-for-the-Web2.0kit-tp19519690p19633578.html Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
