On 22/09/2008, Thomas Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > > > > Well, IMHO you simply erred on the servlet-api / jsp-api thing > > (empire-db, as an AL 2.0 licensed project is obviously free to include > > the jars from Apache tomcat, an AL 2.0 licensed project. The LICENSE and > > NOTICE files from Tomcat state that these files are under AL 2.0). > > > > True. I did not realize the jars are from tomcat, sorry for that. But, on > the other hand, nobody told me. > > > > And, BTW, according to > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html, the > > CDDL 1.0 is part of the "B" list, which means, you can even bundle the > > unmodified binary archives, as long as you put appropriate documentation > > into LICENSE and NOTICE. > > > > This is also required by the license. But it was not done in the release > candidate in question. > > I'd reckon that we all now agree that the tomcat jars can be included. >
Assuming that they have not included the jars incorrectly. Perhaps it would be better to double-check with legal? > Thomas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
