Noel J. Bergman wrote:
With respect to "Initially, we plan to start with one committer each from Carnegie Mellon and Intel Research, with a Yahoo committer to be determined later", that's awkwardly phrased. It appears to imply a corporate representative doing commits for "hidden" people, something that we consider to be an anti-pattern.
That is not the intent. The intent is for Yahoo! to assign someone to work on this project as a direct contributor. But that person has not yet been identified.
Whomever is to be actively involved in development should be on the committer list. If it is just a community of just The Two Michaels, fine, but the wording should be rephrased.
+1 If Y! does not name someone soon, then that entry should be removed. A committer from Y! can always be added later, based on merit.
Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
