That would be my preference - it feels cleaner and still allows the release to be in the central repository (which is my main concern - our end-users would be quite upset if they couldn't get our releases from the main repo anymore). I prefer not to have 'incubating' attached to the version.
Although a minor distinction, I prefer the group ids to be org.apache.incubator.podlingname --> org.apache.podlingname This just makes sense given that group ids are usually domain names. On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:30 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, to avoid collisions like that you could change the package name: > > org.apache.incubating.podlingname > > > Once it graduates, you get: > > org.apache.podlingname > > > > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>The problem with that is when the project graduates and they remove >>>incubator from the groupId, there is a good potential to have two >>>versions of the same packages being pulled in >> >> You're right, I overlooked that... so I guess the qualifier attached to >> the version is probably the best bet. >> >> --Brian >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
