On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > > Hi Dims, > > > > This looks good, so let me comment specifically on things that IMO need > clarification. > > > > On May 5, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > > #2: Create and maintain a charter that governs the PMC/project(s) > > > > > > > That's probably obsolete. I recall seeing some TLP's having a charter, but > I don't think that's an ongoing practice. All projects are part of a single > org (ASF) after all. > > > > I believe that "bylaws" are required. At least the creation of > bylaws is mentioned in the TLP resolutions I have read last year. > While all projects are part of the ASF, they still have different > ways to handle code review, release preparation, project plans, > and so on. > A "charter" serves to define the scope of a project, but I've > seen projects that just use their TLP resolution to that end. > Of course I've also seen both terms being used interchangeably :-)
i think http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html are the bylaws referred to - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
