On that note, since there has been so discussion on this thread, I think it might be time to open another thread and formally decide whether to accept the Thrift proposal, which I will go do now.
-Ted. On Feb 7, 2008 9:14 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 to Ted's message. I am not trying to sabotage the proposal, just > trying to point out the potential problems you might run into during > incubation/at graduation. > > IIUC, you can release code that is completely vetted, so if parts are > still unvetted, it would not prevent you from releasing the checked > bits. (As long as the non-covered code is not part of the release). > > The incubator is a place to learn the Apache way and clear any > concerns that have been voiced. The burden is not when entering the > incubator but in the incubating process, and I am sure thrift will do > great in the incubator, and become a great addition to the foundation. > > Martijn > > -- > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- HTH, Ted http://husted.com/ted/blog/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
