Kevan Miller wrote: > > +1. I'm not sure if my vote is binding or not. >
Thank you! Only votes of Incubator PMC members are binding. Unless you are one we still need one more IPMC vote. Could we have an IPMC member either confirm that Kevan's vote counts or kindly check out the tarball and give us the last binding yay? Kevan Miller wrote: > > I did not build (or test). However, RAT and brief of inspection of > source looked good. > > One comment -- I see that many source files contain Rogue Wave > Software copyrights (e.g. src/access.h) and one source file contains > an HP copyright (i.e. src/parisc/atomic.s). If at all possible, these > copyrights should be removed from your source (by the copyright > holder, of course) -- they are already in your NOTICE. Hmm. Although > the HP copyright is 2002 in your source file and 1994 in your NOTICE > file... > > --kevan > With the exception of src/parisc/atomic.s all of the rest of the files that bear the HP copyright are from 1994 (the HP STL). I'll update NOTICE.txt to on trunk reflect the atomic.s date of copyright. My understanding of the HP license is that it must appear in all files so we wouldn't be able to remove it without HP's permission. I'll have to check with Rogue Wave legal to see what they think about moving our copyright notices to just one file. Thanks again. Martin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-stdcxx-4.2.0-release-tf4681976.html#a13461410 Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
