On 10/22/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Janne, > > I'm copying the incubator general list for feedback from others with > more experience in ICLA vs. Software Grant... > > On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Janne Jalkanen wrote: > > >> Perhaps you can recap the status of the code. Was most of the code > >> written by a small number of people? Were there a large number of > >> substantial contributors at some point? Either a Software Grant or > >> an ICLA would be appropriate once we understand the nature of the > >> contributions. > > > > This reflects the current situation pretty accurately. I've > > contacted everyone, so I know how to find them. > > > > http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing > > > > If they don't want to sign an ICLA, a software grant is still > > sufficient? > > Yes. An ICLA covers current and future contributions, but if all they > want is to grant rights and not contribute further, a Software Grant > is fine. If they want to contribute in future, they can always submit > an ICLA later.
this sounds right to me - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
