Jim and I discussed it a bit since it came in "right around" the 48 hour limit (and the huge Incubator report is definitely sensitive to that timing restriction). Since the report will effectively have a couple days for people to review it, then it seemed fine, and I told Jim that I'd accept it (as this month's shepherd). Sure, it isn't in the agenda (yet), but the report *is* available for review. (recall that we only require it be sent to board@; if Chairs also check it into the agenda... "great, thanks for helping")
Cheers, -g On 9/17/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On 9/17/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This was past our 48hour cutoff and, as is usually the case > >> for the Incubator reports, pretty long. You are the shep for > >> the Incubator this month. I am leaning towards not accepting > >> this but if, as shepherd, you feel comfortable with it > >> being added, I will defer to your judgement. > > > > I just did my reviews and it wasn't in there, so +1 for not accepting. > > -- justin > > Having already reviewed it while it lived at incubator, I'm giving Greg > my 100% backing to accept or not, his call. > -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
