Upayavira wrote:
> If your private@ list vote had three +1s from IPMC members (e.g.
> your mentors), then IMO all you need to do is inform the IPMC of
> the vote when complete.
Should probably notify the PMC at the time of the vote.
> the request for an account should be sent by an IPMC member, likely
> one of your mentors.
+1
> The idea of the "IPMC taking control" seems a little strange - I
> cannot imagine the IPMC being sufficiently organised/motivated to
> do that work. Your mentor however, who is also an IPMC member,
> should be sufficiently motivated.
Agreed.
> I don't personally want to see the IPMC private list given over to
> voting in new committers on podlings. That would make, IMO that list
> pretty unusable. My take on Noel's comments is that the podling should
> ensure that it has got 3 +1s from IPMC members.
Correct. IMO, a notice of the vote to private@ isn't a bad idea, and shouldn't
be a high volume issue.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
