MIT is an authorized license. It shouldn't be an issue so long as you include the correct NOTICE entry.
http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html [I think there's a newer location for this document but I don't have it handy] On 3/16/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I should perhaps have asked the attached question here ... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 16-Mar-2007 16:44 Subject: New dependency on GroboUtils, and hence MIT license To: tuscany-dev <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1179 has a useful concurrency test case attached to it which would introduce a test scope dependency on GroboUtils, from http://groboutils.sourceforge.net/, and therefore on the MIT license (http://groboutils.sourceforge.net/license.html ). Note, we don't need to distribute this in a release, but anyone building and testing SDO would download it from a maven repository as part of the build/unit test process. The license looks OK to be, but having dug around a bit I'm still not completely confident I can introduce this dependency. Is there a precedent for using this license in Tuscany? Do I need IP clearance, and if so how do I ask for it? Regards, Kelvin.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
